|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- The opinions expressed herein are solely mine, and do not reflect the
positions or policy of the Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau /
Standardbred Investigative Services
|
|
3
|
- The participants are clearly identified
- Motivations and corresponding Actions are transparent
- Differences between the participants are readily available to other
participants, officials, and to horse racing customers
|
|
4
|
- The wager can be made with a reasonable assertion that all other
wagering customers have access to the same information about the
participants
- Once a wager is receipted, the wager is valid and reflected in the
wagering host’s pools
- At the point that the wagering pool closes, after this point wagers
cannot be made, changed, or cancelled
|
|
5
|
- Toolset: TRPB Betting Analysis Initiative
- In operation on all TRPB thoroughbred racetracks associations conducting
meetings
- Scaleable to include all HTA harness racetrack associations wagering
- Expanding capability in 2007 to cross reference participants/performance
and results
|
|
6
|
- Verify that the location making the wager is the identified retail
location and not something else
- Ensure the ownership and management of the location is legitimate
- Find how wagers are made and that the host track is aware of a site’s
operation
- Toolset: TRPB Due Diligence process for Host Tracks
|
|
7
|
- Officials are fully capable and empowered to deal effectively with any
rule violation
- Policing of racing and wagering is efficient & comprehensive
- Deterrents impact the actions of participants
|
|
8
|
- Each constituent group in horseracing performs their role in their one
best interest
- Integrity of wagering is a central responsibility of the racetrack
operator
- The TRPB & SIS support the racetrack’s role
|
|
9
|
|