
Stan Bergstein's Daily Racing Form columnsWith permission of Daily Racing Form,
Stan Bergstein’s bi-weekly
columns for that publication will appear
here every other week.
January 25, 2006
Indiana a step ahead of the pack
You may
not know Joe Gorajec's name unless you're from Indiana, but he is a
mover and a shaker whose voice in racing administration is heard well
beyond Hoosierdom.
Gorajec
is the only executive director the Indiana Horse Racing Commission has
ever had. He was determined, when he took the job 15 years ago, to make
Indiana a leader in racing, and he has worked hard and productively
toward that goal.
This
week, the Indiana commission considered a proposal from Gorajec that
would expand his horizons, and Indiana's.
It is
called Integrity '06, and is strong medicine. Its focus is deterring
administration of unauthorized medication on race days, and many of its
recommendations extend far beyond current industry practices. If
adopted, it could boost Indiana's already lofty status as a leader in
tough enforcement.
Gorajec
proposes identifying each horse scheduled to race with a highly visible
stall sign reading "In Today." The track would be required to employ
additional security to deter and detect any prohibited practices.
Ship-ins - those horses coming from offtrack facilities, a major
security problem in racing - would have to arrive early on race day "to
provide some level of oversight parity between horses stabled on and off
the track."
Gorajec
makes no secret that he thinks veterinarians are part of racing's
medication problem. He proposes requiring practicing veterinarians to be
escorted by a track employee during the period of time that Salix (furosemide,
commonly known as Lasix) is administered, and that all race-day draws of
Salix into the syringe for administration be made by, or in view of, an
association employee.
To
Gorajec's and the Indiana Racing Commission's credit, nothing other than
Salix can be administered to a horse racing in Indiana during the 24
hours prior to post time. All racing jurisdictions should have that
courage and foresight.
No
prerace injectibles can be used or possessed, and under Gorajec's
proposal daily medication reports would have to be filed by
veterinarians. They also would have to file medication reports of all
administrations to horses racing in Indiana but stabled offtrack. And
trainers or other licensees would be prohibited from utilizing offtrack
services of veterinarians who are suspended, excluded, or ineligible for
licensing.
Indiana's blood gas program - the detection of milkshaking - differs
from industry standards in two ways. First, there is a testing
laboratory ontrack, so horses with high blood gas levels can be
scratched prior to the start of a race, rather than be disqualified
after, as in most other racing jurisdictions. This protects the public,
and in some cases trainers and owners, from receiving penalties after
the fact. Second, the Indiana program runs blood gas tests on both
harness horses and Thoroughbreds, not true in many states.
Gorajec
proposes having the tracks pay for testing and increased security by
deducting 3 percent from their subsidies from Indiana's unique program
where riverboat admissions taxes are used to help offset the floating
casinos' heavy competition to the state's racing industry. The riverboat
subsidy payments to tracks are not insignificant. Last year they
amounted to $27,083,893.
Gorajec
said he feels he can cut this subsidy because Indiana racing law says
the commission may make a subsidy grant only for purses, promotions, and
routine operations of the racetrack. He considers security a routine
operation of the track.
Rick
Moore and Jon Schuster, who run Indiana's two tracks, Hoosier Park and
Indiana Downs, both believe in limiting race-day medication. They think
Gorajec's plan has merit, but say his funding formula needs study and
discussion. The Indiana Horse Racing Commission on Tuesday agreed,
deferring action on Gorajec's proposal until its next meeting on March
7, in order to give the tracks and other involved parties an opportunity
to study the proposal.
The
transfer of all costs to the track may be convenient and easy, but it is
not necessarily equitable. Horse racing is an agricultural industry in
all states that present it. Indiana understands that, as its riverboat
subsidy bill protecting racing indicates clearly. Policing racing is the
state's job as well as the track's, and the state should share the cost,
not merely dump it on tracks already hard-pressed economically.
Gorajec
surveyed other racing commissions regarding their security practices and
received 16 responses. Of the states that answered, only one -
Minnesota
- requires supervision of the Salix draw. Only three prohibit
veterinarians from possessing predrawn or loaded syringes in their
vehicles. Only four prohibit trainers stabled offtrack from utilizing
services of suspended vets. And only one, again Minnesota, requires
licensed vets to be escorted by a commission or track employee on race
day.
That
noise you hear is Joe Gorajec, shaking things up again.
|