
Stan Bergstein's Daily Racing Form columnsWith permission of Daily Racing Form,
Stan Bergstein’s bi-weekly
columns for that publication will appear
here every other week.
October 19, 2005
Racing needs this expert
Suddenly, on
Tuesday of this week, the huge problem that horse racing faces exploded
in an unexpected place: the pages of the highly respected Washington
Post.
A long story,
by Post staff writer Amy Shipley, was headlined, "Chemists Stay a Step
Ahead of Drug Testers," with a subhead reading, "Internet Offers New
Steroids Designed to be Undetectable."
The story was
not about horse racing. But those who could not read between the lines,
or preferred not to, will hear long echoes of this story for months to
come, and the name of the man central in it, Dr. Don Catlin of UCLA.
Already known
worldwide in baseball and Olympic sports, he hopefully will become a
familiar name to owners and trainers in racing. They can learn what may
be happening to their horses from him, a lesson some sadly know already,
inside and out.
Dr. Catlin
addressed the Jockey Club Round Table in August and gave a few hints of
how difficult the problem is for horse racing. Not long afterward, Nick
Nicholson, president of Keeneland, and breeder Will Farish announced an
effort to underwrite new testing efforts under Dr. Catlin's direction.
Catlin directs the U.S. Olympic drug testing lab at UCLA, and is the man
who broke the Balco scandal in baseball by uncovering, two years ago,
tetrahydrogestrinone, or THG.
Shipley's
Post story was both enlightening and frightening.
It began, "If
members of Congress leading efforts to eradicate performance-enhancing
drugs from athletics want to get an idea of just how difficult it will
be, they need only turn to the Internet."
She
explained, "The Web already offers a new generation of steroids designed
to avoid current tests."
And she gave
graphic evidence of just how easy it is to get them.
The Post
bought five dietary supplements online - each of which touted its
ability to build muscle fast - and sent them to Dr. Catlin for analysis.
He found that four of them contained previously unidentified anabolic
steroids. Another was discovered only two years ago, and was thought to
be in limited circulation.
Dr. Catlin
told the Post: "They are all steroids. They are all going to be
effective." And they ranged in cost from $50 to $125 a bottle.
The Post
story continued: "This might just be the beginning. Two officials with
prominent U.S. dietary supplement companies, who spoke on condition of
anonymity, said it is easy for companies to outwit drug testers.
'There's an unlimited pool of steroids,' one official said. 'You could
do this for the next 100 years. . . . The longer they don't pay
attention the more rampant it gets.'"
These
compounded drugs have put the chemists far ahead of the testers, in
professional sports and just as surely in racing. As Ms. Shipley points
out, they can do it "just by slightly altering the chemical properties
of known banned drugs or by turning to long-forgotten recipes from
steroid cookbooks from the 1950's and 1960's."
Dr. Catlin
said, "It's pretty obvious what's going on. The companies are making
tons of money. If they don't get caught, they turn on the spigot and
turn out more."
Then this
from the Post: "The supplement company officials said the lenient
sentences handed down in the Balco probe seem to have emboldened U.S.
companies to delve into the distribution of newly created designer
steroids, moving an industry previously the secret domain of
black-market chemists, tight-lipped middlemen, and small groups of elite
athletes into the mainstream."
It is
interesting that horse racing's early efforts to enlist Dr. Catlin's
help already have been criticized by some, and not-too-subtle efforts
have been made to discredit Dr. Catlin's racing credentials. It has been
pointed out, for example, that he is not a veterinarian, and not an
expert on horses or horse racing.
He is, of
course, perhaps the leading authority in the world on one of the most
serious problem horse racing faces, a problem that racing in its past
spirit of denial would rather not acknowledge. It is folly to think that
those seeking an edge in racing would hesitate to use substances known
to build strength, regardless of what veterinarians say about
differences in horses and humans.
The issue of
the Nicholson-Farish proposal to enlist Dr. Catlin's aid and where it
fits in the work of the Racing Medication and Testing Consortium is
being discussed by the parties this week in Lexington, Ky.
Both Dr.
Catlin's participation and the work of the Racing Consortium are
critical to the welfare of the sport, and hopefully horse racing will
not miss the opportunity to avail itself of Dr. Catlin's expertise.
|