
Stan Bergstein's Daily Racing Form columnsWith permission of Daily Racing Form,
Stan Bergstein’s bi-weekly
columns for that publication will appear
here every other week.
June 14, 2005
Drug cheats topic of expose
"Mirror, mirror on the
wall, who's the fairest of them all?"
It's not us.
At least, not
according to the English newspaper The Racing Post, which took a long
look at United States racing recently in a four-part series and
concluded that our horsemen were using chemistry at an alarming rate.
I happen to agree.
The series was written
by Paul Haigh, and in typical English journalistic style, the headlines
were big and bold.
It started with this
quote, in very large type: "Only in racing do guys become superstars at
the snap of a finger. It's chemicals and painkillers. Cheating works,
and honesty is finishing a distant second."
The is not just
Haigh's opinion. Much of his series consists of quotes he has attributed
to American racing figures.
The one above was
attributed to Richard Bomze, president of the New York Thoroughbred
Horsemen's Association, identified by Haigh as "a man of considerable
means and with no particular axe to grind." There was considerably more
to it. As quoted by Haigh, Bomze said, "I also learned in casual
discussions what some of the cheaters are using to steal from their
fellow trainers. The playing field isn't even. It stinks. Some of the
vets and the drug enforcers know what's going on, but they can't prove
it.
"The racing game is
amazing. It's the only game in the world where a mediocre trainer, a
run-of-the-mill guy with a 10 percent or lower win-rate, all of a sudden
can't lose. He claims a loser by 20 lengths, moves it up in class and
romps by ten. Come on, give me a break. You don't become a Michael
Jordan, Kobe Bryant, Sammy Sosa or Wayne Gretzky overnight.
"Only in racing do
guys become superstars at the snap of a finger. It ain't talent, baby.
It's chemicals and painkillers, and we all know who the bums are. You
don't have to be a Ph.D. to see what's going on, and it had better
stop."
Haigh also quoted Ken
Kush, whom he identified as not some failed trainer, not some crybaby
loser, but a "leading financier and racing fan." He wrote that Kush
said, "A hideous corruption of ethics has spread through the ranks of
American trainers, reaching the very top. The attitude of many trainers
is similar to the one that infected several leaders of corporate America
- namely, cheating works, honesty finishes a distant second. The
cheating takes the form of chemical warfare, and it is being waged at
America's premier racetracks.
"The cheaters get only
positive reinforcement for their actions: wins, trophies, status,
adulation. It's clear racing needs purging like the one sweeping
corporate America. The cheaters need to be exposed. . . .
"Some of racing's
journalists need to spend less time writing fawning accolades to the
cheaters and more time asking tough questions."
Haigh led off his
series quoting - who else? - Jeff Mullins. He mentioned Mullins's
thoughtless interview with Los Angeles Times columnist T.J. Simers, and
quoted Mullins saying, "I train to win, and that's all I care about.
It's not my problem if the general public is deceived. It never will be
a level playing field. There are a lot of things people don't know, and
won't know."
The second installment
of the Haigh series was titled, "The vets' guide to winning." He wrote
that while handicappers are starting to bet almost solely on trainers
and not individual horses, "those with more sophisticated knowledge are
betting on vets, not trainers."
Chapter 3 was called,
" 'Could it happen in Britain' is the wrong question. The right one is
'is it happening yet?' " Haigh concludes that "the potential for abuse
is frightening - and it would destroy public confidence," and then he
returns to a quote by Ken Kush: "Silence is effectively complicity.
Straight racing is the only sort worth preserving."
Haigh winds up his
four-part series by quoting Andy Beyer, saying: "Drugs . . . have
debased the wonderful game of handicapping.
"Drugs have made it as
difficult to cheer for racing's champions as it is to root for Barry
Bonds."
Haigh's own final
words in this long and devastating series are worth noting: "It may be
that in the end, no sport will be able to resist the effects of
scientific knowledge when it comes to performance enhancement, that
every sporting hero from now on will have to live with the fans asking,
'I wonder what he's on?'
"But we owe it to
ourselves, and to Thoroughbreds everywhere, to give it a very good try."
|