
Stan Bergstein's Daily Racing Form columnsWith permission of Daily Racing Form,
Stan Bergstein’s bi-weekly
columns for that publication will appear
here every other week.
February 8, 2005
Milkshaking just tip of
drug-dealing iceberg
Thoroughbred racing's sudden
concern about milkshaking, and the rush of jurisdictions that have
ignored it for years to now urgently do something about it, is
symptomatic of the most dangerous problem in racing today.
But the bicarbonate brouhaha
is the tip of the iceberg.
Milkshaking - the
administration of sodium bicarbonate to reduce the buildup of lactic
acid and ensuing fatigue - is like addition and subtraction in first
grade. It is where things start, not where they end.
The administration of
performance-enhancing drugs to racehorses has developed into a
calculus of chemistry, a sophisticated industry of compounding drugs
that can escape detection and give users a huge edge.
Hardboot proponents of
permissive medication argue that there is no substance that can make a
horse run faster than he can run.
It is a specious argument.
Performance-enhancing drugs
do just what the name says: they enhance performance, by reducing
fatigue, increasing strength, altering natural performance.
If that were not true, the
multimillion-dollar program of the World Anti-Doping Agency, which is
leading the battle to find currently undetectable designer drugs,
would be a waste of money. The agency is doing it because it knows
that swimmers on drugs can swim faster, runners can run faster, and
jumpers jump higher, and baseball players using enhancements can hit
balls farther than those not using illegal substances.
Some of the world's top
chemists know it, too. If it were not true, racing might as well let
trainers use anything they can get their hands on - EPO, darbopoietin,
sophisticated and dangerous undetectables - which a few do today.
Major League Baseball finally
is acknowledging there is a problem. So are officials in
football-crazy Texas, where nine high school players taking steroids
made national headlines last week by admitting they were using them,
after their coach had called the parent who broke the story a liar.
Those nine high school kids - and does anyone believe they are alone?
- obviously believe they can bulk themselves up to the behemoth size
it now takes to make college or professional linemen, or make them
pass or kick farther than they can otherwise, or run faster. And they
believe it without knowing, or caring, what it can do to them
physically, just as those horse trainers who use chemicals do so
without knowing, or apparently caring, what it can do to their horses.
The problem facing racing in
North America and everywhere else today is not simply milkshaking a
horse. Things have gone far beyond that. The problem is exactly what
Dr. Gary Wadler, a clinical associate professor at New York University
and an expert on performance-enhancing substances, called it.
It is drug dealing.
The biggest news in racing in
recent weeks was not the Eclipse Awards in Los Angeles or the bust at
Aqueduct in New York.
The biggest news came in
Montreal and Maryland.
In Montreal, the World
Anti-Doping Agency announced it had found a way to detect DMT, the
latest designer drug that until now had escaped detection. It
apparently is more advanced and far more complex than THG, which broke
open the BALCO baseball and track-and-field scandal last year.
In Maryland, the Thoroughbred
Racing Protective Bureau announced that Franklin T. Fabian, an FBI
veteran who headed oversight of undercover work at the Bureau, would
step into the big shoes of Paul Berube, the retiring president of the
TRPB and its sister organization, Standardbred Investigative Services.
Berube spent much of his time chasing and catching drug dealers.
Hopefully, Fabian will expand that effort to the backstretches of
North America.
These twin developments are
what racing needs desperately: detection of currently undetectable
drugs that are turning journeymen horsemen into overnight training
sensations, and an undercover network to uncover the veil of silence
on the backstretch and put away the cheaters.
Thoroughbred racing for years
considered milkshaking a harness racing problem, until Dr. Ron
Jensen's finding of 10 percent positives in runners in California,
when the sport awoke to find that horses are horses, and horsemen who
choose to cheat are not breed-specific.
Undetectable designer drugs
are not breed-specific, either.
Uniform rules and penalties
are absolutely needed, and that is what the Racing Medication and
Testing Consortium is closing in on. But detection of designer drugs
is an even bigger problem, and racing needs to bite the bullet and
spend the millions it will take to solve it. |